Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 6:53 am
In the U.S. government's H-2B guestworker program, visas tie guestworkers to a single "employer-sponsor" without the ability to change jobs. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 3:24 am
In fact, Section 2(1)(h) begins with the expression “unless the context otherwise requires”. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:37 pm
This definition does a good job of that. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:49 am
The trial court wrote, "the parties dispute whether the defendants entered Pal's home, and the video footage submitted does not show a clear picture of what occurred at the front door. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:51 pm
It does not confer any new benefits and applies to all visa applicants. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:00 am
Guy H. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Several weeks ago, the litigant filed Doe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:22 am
A pick like this does create the opportunity to reward political allies, but basing a Supreme Court appointment on such considerations would be a wasted opportunity. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:54 am
Where does this all leave us? [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a revised opinion in Doe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:40 am
The authors also note that this legal argument sweeps quite broadly, and would suggest that universities and employers that require testing for those on-site (as my employer does) are also violating federal law. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 10:16 am
The new policy does not preclude the executive branch from revoking deferred action in individual cases and does not create any enforceable rights against future executive action. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:35 am
The principle here is "one State, two votes," not "one person, one vote," and the filibuster does nothing to obviate or trump that principle. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 7:08 am
But the book also reminds us that humility does not mean indolence. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:05 am
Whether the Court should overrule Chevron or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
Does he appear remorseful to you? [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 7:15 am
And the CDC order itself says it does not apply "to the extent its application is prohibited by federal court order. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 10:39 am
We appreciate that our main finding does not rule this out. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:40 am
In short, each discreet determination regulators must make is an opportunity for rent-seeking, and the implementation and adoption of cap-and-trade systems require far more such determinations than does the adoption of a tax or price system. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:37 am
Banks, attorneys and others are bound to respect federal law even in the absence of conforming state laws, and the legalization of a product at the state law does not eliminate the federal prohibition. [read post]
