Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 15,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
There is probably much I have missed, but the sketch above is a beginning. [1] Peter H. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Meade J rejected this, as whilst the Patent would make network planning easier, that is not all that it does. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Virginia Bar (1964) 377 U.S. 1; cf. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:55 pm
You also have a house in your own name, worth $700,000 and some investment accounts worth $1 million. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 1. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
Legal framework [in fact, this section discusses purely the statutory framework, not yet the appellate case law][European] Union lawThe following passages are excerpts from the recitals of Directive 2004/48/EC:(1) The achievement of the Internal Market entails [...] [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
Does 1-41, W.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
The per se damages rule does not apply to the latter. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
(relisted after the March 19, March 26, April 1, April 16, April 23 and April 30 conferences) Allen v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:21 am
Question 1: Does the law mandate that employers provide insurance to their employees? [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
Resources Code, § 21080.09(e)(1).) [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
(Pausing here, the CA does not actually record the appellant landlord as having argued that there had to be certainty of payment, indeed at [23] the appellant is recorded as having argued that future receipts do not come into Stage 1 “even if such sums are to be paid and it is known will be paid in the week following which the service charge becomes payable”; the landlord did however appear to argue for certainty as a minimum condition in the UT, see [39] of… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:44 pm
"Minutes", the written report of a meeting created by a public body required by subsection (a) of section 23 and section 5A of chapter 66. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:31 pm
For example, effective July 1, 2013, UnitedHealthcare has limited the use of copay coupons for certain specialty drugs. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:13 am
In re Highlights for Children, Inc., Serial No. 85838981 (March 23, 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 1:54 am
Even if there were an opportunity to provide comments, the EPO does not have a great track record of delving into the nuances of user responses (IPKat). [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
The Bank of New York Mellon, December 23, 2014, Livingston, D.).Background. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
” K-Swiss’s second plea in law was that the the Board of Appeal ought to have supplemented the evidence at its disposal, as under Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009, OHIM must examine of its own motion the relevant facts that could lead it to apply an absolute ground for refusal set out in Article 7(1) of that regulation. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:46 pm
§ 615(f)(1)(B)(i). [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:40 am
(2) Article 6 of the AUCL does not protect the signs, or their distinctive identifying parts, that are forbidden from use by Article 10(1) of the Trademark Law of China. [read post]
