Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 4741 - 4760 of 7,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 2:54 am by Madeline Reardon, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
The issues for the Supreme Court concern the proper approach to be taken to an Article 13(b) defence in child abduction cases; and the interaction between the domestic approach to the Convention and that of the European Court of Human Rights, following the ECHR case of Neulinger and Shuruk v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:04 pm by Michelle Gee
Do you owe the same debt to society if you've been here illegally for two years v. twenty years? [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:02 pm
These will be made available to international patent offices through the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), TKDL director V K Gupta told reporters here. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 8:58 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Source: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Again, history is brought to bear to support the conclusions stated in the two sides’ conflicting briefs. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Jamison Koehler
 As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
However, in a questionable way, the English Judge has already assumed that he could also do so (see here). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm by Ronald Mann
In a rare moment for the Roberts Court, the opinion in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands addressed that question broadly and categorically, passing up every opportunity to narrow or confine its ruling. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]