Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 15,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2007, 1:09 pm
US v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
Back in June, the Connecticut Supreme Court issued its decision in Ziotas v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:32 am
“the BBC complain that there aren’t enough ethnic minorities on TV and they go and axe Crimewatch…go figure” 19 October 2017; b. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:13 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
(3) In Hustler v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:59 am
This is a tactic that was exposed in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB): the figure offered by News of the World to ‘Woman E‘ was £25,000 but she only received £12,000 after she delivered the video material. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
In Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
In Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
But even with that case, some presume he must have had some grand, sophisticated insight into the law, and that his non-compliance was either legally permissible or not worth bothering such a figure about.This reasoning is a mystery to me for a couple reasons. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Consumer Depot, Abramson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:14 am
See Thomas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm
Miller Canfield's response on behalf of Cooley Law School is expected to be filed any day now.This blog predicts that the Michigan Court of Appeals will grant leave for this issue to be decided; apparently one of first impression here in Michigan.At stake is the ability of vocal critics of a "public figure" to express their opinion anonymously, without the fear of having their mask pulled off, and their identity disclosed.You'll have to stay tuned for the results… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
What you may find in a brown envelope MMI v Cellxion shows that it is not strictly necessary to find a point of principle in order to appeal on the question of obviousness. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 3:12 am
In Catlin Syndicate Limited v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:49 pm
You can get all the details here.Another case the IPKat reviewed earlier this year is Daimler v Sany, in which Daimler sued Sany for trade mark infringement and passing off, claiming that Sany's device mark (right) caused confusion with and took unfair advantage of, or caused detriment to the well-known Mercedes Benz figurative mark (below left). [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am
No less a legal figure as Stephen Colbert declared “They knew, that if they were honest, they wouldn’t get the job. [read post]
5 May 2012, 10:19 am
During the consultation we will go through your divorce and figure out where you are in the process. [read post]
