Search for: "Green v. Green"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 8,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
D, Philip Green, Thomas D. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:43 am
Zearfoss v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 9:16 am
Related Cases: White v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:09 pm
Utilizing promises of obtaining green cards, the couple began raising money prior to being certified as a regional center. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:01 am
Norris v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:19 pm
In a separate decision [PDF], in SAS Institute v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:13 pm
Morales v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm
In Lindke v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
In Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The full story on Community registered designs & the CJEU - Nintendo v Big Ben. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"** See Green v New YorkCityPoliceDepartment,et al., 235 AD2d 475. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
In the Ariosa Diagnostics v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:22 am
The occasion is Foster v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:04 pm
The paper omits crucial language from Mathews v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the border search case U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
The landmark ruling in Gideon v. [read post]