Search for: "Howe v. Roberts"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 10,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
” And Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic suggests that “if you want to follow just one Justice [during the oral argument], try the chief justice, John Roberts… It’ll be a quick way to gauge how he’s doing on that infamous pledge at his confirmation hearing about being an umpire. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
I think that neither the merchants nor the card networks will be jubilant about the Supreme Court’s narrow decision yesterday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
Our next Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, sitting patiently as the senators blather on (Slate has this great chart comparing how many minutes she speaks with how many the senators do), was finally asked about the death penalty near the end of the day yesterday. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
’ [Robert J. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:31 pm
” How wrong they would have been! [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
Clement for appellants in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:32 pm
Roberts, Jr., and Justice Antonin Scalia over how the Court in Miranda had treated the FBI warning in use at the time. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
As noted in my preview last week, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is the Supreme Court’s first arbitration case of the 2019 term. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm
So how is one to give effect to the fact that the word “should” is used and not “must” in the context of how the request for a review might be made when the Act did not stipulate how such a request had to be made? [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
Under the Supreme Court’s ruling last term in Alexander v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Justice Kennedy, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, reasoned that the principle that consideration of race in admissions is permissible when certain conditions are met was not challenged; the issue was whether, and how, state voters may choose to prohibit consideration of such racial preferences. [read post]
17 Jun 2025, 4:56 am
And how? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:20 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
See Prince v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm
Indeed, while reading the piece, I had flashbacks to NFIB v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
Whitman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
More than a week after oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
