Search for: "In re Roberts" Results 4741 - 4760 of 13,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:20 am by Matt Sundquist
Her view in 2005 "that Roberts plans to pursue an activist, conservative agenda" remains the same today. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am by Diane Marie Amann
“And a lot of times nobody thinks that’s going to change anything,” Roberts said, “but you can understand Argentina or any other country saying, look, before we’re going to arbitrate, you know, try our courts, you may find – you may be surprised, right? [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:20 am by Ronald Mann
Roberts could simply go along with a majority, but his strong views at argument suggest he would make the effort to document a dissent. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:18 pm
 If you're keeping score, that's R 12 - D 4. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:53 am by SHG
I bet you're shocked to find out that Supreme Court Justices probably didn't pre-order the iPad, desperate to be on the cutting edge of cool. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
*********By the way, Scalia joined in Roberts' comments. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:56 pm by Amy Howe
The administration may eventually, as Trump predicted, win in the Supreme Court, but this round went to the challengers, and the eventual fate of the case almost certainly lies in Roberts’ hands. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:24 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  Twice Congress has responded, and quickly, by re-expanding the scope of the FCA, and in a third case, PPACA had already addressed the issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm by Orin Kerr
 We only have the public record, and we’re stuck trying to read the tea leaves to figure out what’s happening in the building. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:52 am
But not in California - you're not surprised by this are you? [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 11:16 am by Kathryn Rubino
Shorter John Roberts statement: And I’m not the only one unimpressed. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:45 am by Rumpole
And now you're handing out out three decades for a fleeing? [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm by Joey Fishkin
 But the great drawback is that you’re stuck with your representative. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am by Geoffrey Stone
At the outset, I want to put aside four possible scenarios: (1) Romney is elected and gets no nominations; (2) Obama is re-elected and gets no nominations; (3) Romney is elected and gets to replace Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Roberts, and/or Alito; (4) Obama is re-elected and gets to replace Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and/or Kagan. [read post]