Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 35,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2011, 7:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:41 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:51 am
The government lawyers said that, if the Supreme Court were to rule in favor of the government in the pending case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:46 am
In Burress v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am
On consideration of the certified issue, __ M.J. __, (Daily Journal Apr. 3, 2015), the briefs of the parties, and in view of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Check the United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:16 pm
Herndon, the trial judge stated: “I find your limited testimony you did talk about to be not credible that you don’t remember. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:37 am
Today my colleague Capt Vicki Belleau filed a cert petition seeking review of CAAF's decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
The Attorney General of the United States then obtained a grant of certiorari from the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
USA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In Rutan-Ram v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 5:03 am
Cook’s motion relied in part on Buckman Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2006, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 12:38 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court judge for damages. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:59 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court judge for damages. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
United States, and Trump v. [read post]
