Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 4741 - 4760 of 4,886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
" Joining Kennedy in the majority were the Chief Justice, and Justices Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
The vote was 5-4, Kennedy writing the majority opinion, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:20 am
Casey, ostensibly because Justices Scalia and Thomas, who dissented in Casey, are joining him. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
S. 914, 980-983 (2000) (Thomas, J., dissenting). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
By a vote of five (Justices Breyer, Stevens, Ginsburg, Kennedy, and Alito) to four (Justice Scalia, the Chief, and Justices Thomas and Souter), the Supreme Court - with more than a few fireworks - today upheld the regulations used by the Secretary to make such a determination.Let's start with a bit of background (for more details, you can read Adam Lawton's preview of the case here, and his summary of the argument here). [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 4:39 pm
  And I think it is entirely believable that Kennedy would. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
S., at 580 (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:26 am
  Some court-watchers believe that Justice Stevens was able to entice Justice Kennedy to join the 5-Justice majority for the petitioners by slicing the standing argument narrowly. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
Majority: Kennedy, Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:00 am
Here it is:Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist, joined by Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy, described the setting:The 22 acres surrounding the Texas State Capitol contain 17 monuments and 21 historical markers commemorating the "people, ideals, and events that compose Texan identity. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:34 am
Yes, the New Age "Four Horseman" - Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts, voted to not hear the appeal without reservation. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
  In Cunningham, three justices - Breyer, Kennedy and Alito - concluded that her opinion was inconsistent with the opinion she joined in Booker, the decision from two years ago that the Federal Guidelines were, on balance, more constitutional than not.But in Booker itself, four different justices - Scalia, Thomas, Stevens and Souter - concluded in their messily bickering way that the "remedial opinion" Justice Ginsburg… [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 2:02 pm
” From Justice Scalia’s dissent (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito and Thomas): “The Court’s alarm over global warming may or may not be justified, but it ought not distort the outcome of this litigation. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:41 pm
Do they really think that Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, Ginsburg, & Alito will always interpret the amendment in a way that will further rather than hinder the so-called feminist agenda? [read post]