Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 4741 - 4760 of 6,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has a post “Parliaments and the GDPR” concerned the CJEU case, Case C-272/19 VK v Land Hessen (EU:C:2020:535). [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:46 pm
”  The fee finally adopted by the City totaled $20,946 per unit. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:50 pm
The Board observed that "[t]he popularity of motion pictures in the United States cannot be overstated. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:55 am by admin
  The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:40 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
” The judge found that the greenhouse and utility shed were chattels, stating that they were not annexed to the land, and citing evidence of how easily portable they were. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
Most interesting here is the way in which the reconstitution of state borders in the wake of COVID, non-state collectives now seek the authority to both mark territory and to police those borders against outsiders. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
It excludes evidence of comparative safety between drugs of the same class, fraud on the FDA (due to Buckman preemption), corporate ethics, and regulatory actions outside of the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:24 pm
Even if not, Article 3(a) would provide a clear statutory basis for jurisdiction, though United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am by Kyle Persaud
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution says, “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
Can the Anna Nicole Smith Estate be lucky enough to revive her case in the United States Supreme Court twice? [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
BACKGROUND: Plaintiff alleges defendant United States Coast Guard violated � 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:35 pm by admin
It will further succeed in increasing the ‘popularity’ of Joseph Kony and the LRA in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
In the United States, the law requires that a person have registered a work with the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
The United States thus became a model of justice for the world. [read post]