Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 4741 - 4760 of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
To the right, at one of the exits off the beach on a road leading in land, was a German bunker (see below) that had a clear view of Omaha Beach and had survived the bombings and was laying down a deadly stream of fire. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:43 am
One of these rare design rulings happened yesterday, with the CJEU issuing its decision in Case C‑345/13 Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of Ireland [on the Advocate General's opinion see Jeremy’s post here]. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm by Reference Staff
“A show about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices who interpret it for the rest of America,” episodes of note include The Fear of Too Much Justice on how the Supreme Court and the justice system treat people of color, the poor, and the sick and The Family Roe featuring a conversation with Joshua Prager who investigated and wrote a book on Roe v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:11 am
May the rights which the Member States lay down pursuant to Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC go so far as to enable users of the terminals to print out on paper or store on a USB stick the works made available there? [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
On 28 November 2024 there was a hearing in the case of Titan Wealth v Okunola. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Marie Louise
Including: Zediva shuts down, lays off DVD monkeys; New Zealand ‘3 Strikes’ kicks in (Plagiarism Today)   Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names New generic TLDs: Association of National Advertisers throws a tantrum (IPKat) Reminder: .xxx blocking process (IPblog)   Global – Patents Apple vs. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
At its end lay a level of judicial intervention, which no matter how sugar-coated, dwarfed by orders of magnitude such wimpy decisions as Lochner v. [read post]
An employer in some cases may find that the accommodation that would be required to permit an employee with a human rights concern to continue working under its employ would impose heavy costs or require laying off another employee. [read post]