Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 20,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
United States impose upon all federal prosecutors an obligation to disclose exculpatory and impeachment information. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
No one will confuse Ross v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
On March 1, 2011, the United States Supreme Court held in Staub v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
MacDonald), 162 N.H. at 66, 27 A.3d 813.The defendant argues that `[t]here is a long line of cases’ beginning with State v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
In the words of the United States Supreme Court, “the question of standing is whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Krull , 480 U.S. 340 (1987) (police conducted a search in reasonable reliance on subsequently invalidated state statutes); Arizona v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
“Second, the Presidential Memorandum violates the statute governing apportionment because, so long as they reside in the United States, illegal aliens qualify as ‘persons in’ a ‘State’ as Congress used those words. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 4:57 am
United States, 420 F.3d 1197, 1204-05 (10th Cir.2005) (permitting intervention without an independent showing of standing); United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:56 am
United States, 420 F.3d 1197, 1204-05 (10th Cir.2005) (permitting intervention without an independent showing of standing); United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am
Where, as in Saunders v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 313 and the present case, a person is asked questions at a stage when he has not been charged and the questioning does not form part of a criminal investigation, article 6 will not be engaged. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
How about the one where he analogizes the conduct here to Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union: "See United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Just over a week ago, the United States proposed tariffs on over 1,000 Chinese imports in response to various intellectual property grievances. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
