Search for: "Love v State"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 9,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
Though we would have loved to be wed in our home state, our friends and family helped us charter a medically equipped plane to fly to Maryland. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
They are plaintiffs in Bourke v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
District Court Judge Vacates DOL’s Modified Definition of “Companionship Services” Continue Reading…
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
The NTA also singled out Loving v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:12 am
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently reached an opinion in the case of Nguyen v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
The consideration for the quitclaim was stated as ‘love and affection. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:30 pm
In Wisdom v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Hood v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:03 am
Supreme Court will decide Young v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:31 pm
In Wisdom v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Third Degree Stalking v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
More Cyber Governance – More NIST Discussions – More Information Sharing On the first day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: the NIST cyber security framework. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:59 am
In a recent case, Estate of Moulton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:50 am
In Morales v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
The current Rules and Regulations of the National Parks already states that “[v]isitors [which] are engaged in filming/photography intended for their personal use and enjoyment” are “generally” not required to have a permit. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:08 am
. #1 1491s v. #9 Cobell settlement beneficiaries The 1491s love Jim Thorpe (I think) but not his captor, winning with 93 percent of the vote. [read post]
