Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 5,351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 9:54 pm
"That Specific Objection"There is a question as to what is meant by "specific" in the context of new Rule 36(1)(b). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:08 am
That was the question addressed by the Appellate Division in P. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:19 pm
I reproduce this summary below: (b) Solicitor-client privilege [26] Solicitor-client privilege, or "legal advice privilege", is conceptually different from litigation privilege. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
The parties framed the issue thusly: “Was the effectuation of personnel orders P 05-047 and/or P 05-048 in violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement? [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:18 am
Freightliner Corporation, 72 P.3d 78 (Ore. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
George B. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 2:28 am
P. and Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:16 pm
Section 3605 (B). [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
Stephen P. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 am
But we expect that a lot of doctors treating possibly terminally ill CML patients are going to try to find out over the next few years.And if something goes wrong with this off-label use, the manufacturer's going to be sitting out there with a litigation target on its back, no matter what it does.And that brings us to the second reason we've been thinking about off-label use recently.There's a new case, Riley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
With respect to consumer credit, it should be reflected whether it might be appropriate to align the wording of Articles 15(1)(a) and (b) of the Regulation to the definition of consumer credit of Directive 2008/48/EC . [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.JON BARTLETT, ANDREW R. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
¶ 5(b). [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
The Superior Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter and that Lake was not entitled to the relief sought. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:01 pm
by Ryan McKeen Effective July 1, 2009, the cost of litigating claims in Connecticut is going up: 1. the jury fee in civil actions, from $ 350 to $ 425; 2. the filing fee for bringing a case in the Superior Court, from (a) $ 225 to $ 300 and (b) from $ 120 to $ 175, for a case in which the sole claim for relief is damages of up to $ 2,500 and for summary process, landlord and tenant, and paternity actions; 3. entry fee for small claims court, from $ 35 to $ 75; 4. fees to transfer a small… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:50 pm
A does not require disqualification; B and C do. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm
The matter, Rockland County v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
Moreover, even if adopted by the EC, the Convention would exclude choice of court agreements in several situations falling within the Regulation's scope (Hague Convention, Art. 2(1)(f)-(p)) and would not (save by reciprocal declarations – Art. 22) cover non-exclusive choice of court agreements. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:16 pm
Don’t Count on It Our Health System: Matters Arising Coming This Summer: Health Care Wars Business playing ball with Obama, Dems? [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
D/B/A LAS COLINAS MEDICAL CENTER v. [read post]
