Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 4741 - 4760 of 5,780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 3:32 am by J.E. Alvarez
In my view, the ILC’s latest effort is likely to encounter considerable resistance where it matters the most, among states. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm by James Edward Maule
Consider, for example, the difficulties faced by low-income individuals when dealing with government-controlled child support and custody matters. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:21 am by Steve McConnell
American Tobacco Co., 175 F.R.D. 469, 496 n.28 (E.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:50 pm by Mandelman
  It’s the game where laws don’t matter and all the houses go back to the bank no matter what! [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:06 am
It’s a part of the watershed of the Mississippi River. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am by Betsy McKenzie
This is the Sarbanes-Oxley case, and turns on matters of administrative law, which is Justice Breyer's passion, according to Toobin. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
“[I]n a sense these are instances of an IGO [(international governmental organization)] organ ‘legislating’ directly for [S]tates. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 11:48 am
So with the AmeriKat's mind on other matters, be it a new kitten shortly entering her family's pack (the AmeriKat may be Aunt AmeriKat at any time), or invitations of exciting travel, she was only able to put together some fun bits 'n bobs from the past week in US IP news. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:46 pm by Mark Bennett
Be well, N Update 2: Interesting comment exchange at Pattis’s blog: Pattis: LS: Alas and woe. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:22 am by Andrew Frisch
EDITOR’S NOTE:  In a recent decision going one step further, a court in the Northern District of Texas held on similar evidence, that as a matter of law, the inclusion of a maître d’ did not render a tip pool illegal. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:43 pm by Russell Jackson
  As for me -- I'll keep my focus on the fact that Rule 23 doesn't change the substantive rules, no matter what. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  In Camden:Public nuisance is a matter of state law, and the role of a federal court ruling on a matter of state law . . . is to follow the precedents of the state’s highest court and predict how that court would decide the issue presented. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sheryl Smul and the Smul Trust . . . have a right of action . . . for indemnity against their former attorneys, Stoloff & Silver, LLP and Gary D. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
   whereas abolition of exequatur – the Commission’s main objective – would expedite the free movement of judicial decisions and form a key milestone in the building of a European judicial area, D. [read post]