Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 4741 - 4760 of 5,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), Kent’s… [read post]
14 May 2008, 11:55 am
The act is very involved and affects numerous laws, but as to sex offenders, this bill contains this language:`(m) Fair Housing; Consistent Eligibility and Occupancy Standards-`(1) FAIR HOUSING- Each revitalization plan assisted under this section shall affirmatively further fair housing, as described in subsection (e) of section 808 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968.`(2) CONSISTENT ELIGIBILITY AND OCCUPANCY STANDARDS- Except to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of this… [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:43 am
I'm one of many who believe the truth does matter and should still play a role in justice. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
I'm back from the two-day "Future of the Global Law Firm" symposium at Georgetown Law School, which was organized by Prof. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:22 pm
We were thrilled to get the recent comments from law practice management guru Patrick J. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
 But the Court held the exclusion did not apply, even though Lorillard pled intent, because intent was not required for trademark infringement.Additionally, it did not matter that the policy covered only compensatory damages. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
See Denedo, slip op. at 9 n.2 (Ryan, J., dissenting). [read post]