Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 4741 - 4760 of 5,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(IP tango) Canada CMEC on ‘making multiple copies for class use’ (Excess Copyright) Clearing up the copyright confusion: Fair dealing and Bill C-32 (Michael Geist) C-32 Legislative Committee discussion marked by copyright confusion (Michael Geist) (IP Osgoode) Jim Henshaw asks questions about copying levies (Michael Geist) More schools backing away from Access Copyright (Michael Geist) China China – from national growth to international expansion (IP… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:00 pm by Monique Altheim
http://bit.ly/hr4DNa # Both RT @PrivacyWonk: @CenDemTech @EUdiscovery b/c of that meme or b/c of ..increase in attention by Google/Fb/Twitter "scandals"? [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:19 am
"Trade marks may cover ingredients of manufactured products, and businesses like Intel, Lycra and DSM will adopt a policy of prudently monitoring the use of their registered trade marks by others who use their products in their own manufacture. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by WSLL
§ 6-3-402(a) and (c)(i) (LexisNexis 2009). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:10 pm by IP Dragon
" Secton 10 (1) Trade Marks Act 1994: A person infringes a registered trade mark if he uses in the course of trade a sign which is identical with the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which it is registered.Section 10 (4) Trade Marks Act 1994For the purposes of this section a person uses a sign if, in particular he (c) imports or exports goods under the sign. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:51 am by emagraken
[46]         In my opinion Tekavec owed a duty of care to Mark and to Mark’s guests including Jack. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:46 am by Michael Geist
  For good measure, Brown stated that there was nothing in Bill C-32 for writers. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:54 am by John L. Welch
"Moreover, when an individual is so well known, he or she is entitled to the protection of Section 2(c) without having to show a connection with the involved goods or services. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
The case is Case C-449/09 Canon (see earlier posts here and here), in respect of which the Fifth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union has made an order -- posted on the Curia website in all official languages of the Union except fot English and Slovak -- to the effect that ‘L’article 5 de la première directive 89/104 ..., doit être interprété en ce sens que le titulaire d’une marque peut s’opposer à la… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Morris Turek
  Better go stock up on those stamps that are good forever (or at least until the Postal Service goes belly up). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 4:47 am by SHG
If only lawyers didn't have kids who expect to eat every day, we could serve the greater good for free. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:38 am by gmlevine
This is not good advertisement for consistency of jurisprudence and predictability in the resolution of disputes. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
Newton (Excess Copyright) (IPblog) Putting statutory damages in perspective (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Macleans on C-32 & Fair Dealing: Claims of rampant copying ‘grossly exaggerated’ (Michael Geist) Opening remarks to the Legislative Committee on Bill C-32 (IP Osgoode) NDP MP Angus calls for compromise on Bill C-32 (Michael Geist) C-32’s Fair Dealing (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Sorting through the Copyright Levy proposals… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:54 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Mitchell, The Private Provision of Public Goods: Corporate Commitments and the United Nations Global Compact [read post]