Search for: "Park v State" Results 4741 - 4760 of 11,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am by INFORRM
  As Laing J observed in Merlin v Cave [2014] EWHC 3036 (QB): “There is no express indication in the PHA that Parliament intended the provisions of the PHA to abrogate the rights conferred by Article 10, or to change the law of defamation, which is, by necessary implication, involved in any consideration of the scope of the legitimate restrictions which may be placed by a contracting state on the rights conferred by Article 10. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The City’s resolution stated this action was in City’s “best interest” and the “best way to feasibly mitigate the loss of parking on the [Property], to be assembled with the Hotel Site for hotel parking. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:13 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Vision Zero: Safer Streets for Fort Lauderdale, January 2016, City of Fort Lauderdale More Blog Entries: Smizer v. [read post]