Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 4741 - 4760 of 5,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm by Sinead Ring
This  clarification of the Castle Doctrine is most welcome, since under the common law, (most recently outlined People (DPP) v Barnes) the position is not clear (see my previous blog). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am
Defendant argues the court erred and the fine must be reduced to $10. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:03 am by Kashmir Hill
People who write complete emails in the subject line. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 10:17 pm by Simon Gibbs
That there appear to be as many as two people who regularly read the Legal Costs Blog; or 2. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am by lsammis
Since the FDLE Alcohol Testing Program and CMI wants us to believe that the mysterious machine works just fine they are asking us to draw a lot of conclusions in their favor. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:50 am by INFORRM
It meant that broadcasters could be fined if indecent words went on air. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:55 pm
Yesterday, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its decision in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:56 am by Eugene Volokh
The court also cited (pp. 29–32) many instances in which broadcasters seem to have been actually deterred from airing items — or covering people and events — by the risk of massive fines, especially massive fines based on fleeting expletives. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:25 am by David Lat
Online Surveys & Market Research Wheelchair-bound lawyer ‘molested judge’ (with video) [Banned on the Web] Lawyer: I didn’t mean to touch judge’s butt, my cerebral palsy made me do it [New York Daily News] People v. [read post]