Search for: "People v. More" Results 4741 - 4760 of 43,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
    In January, CalBizLit posted about then scheduled argument in People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
The more dominant you make your mark, the less likely it is to be subject to free riding in distant markets. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
We ban a lot of people from flying because of that. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:15 am by Julie Lam
On May 18, 2010, the Court of Appeals issued its per curiam opinion in People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
” (Ne plus ultra is French for “not more beyond” or “go no further. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm by Florian Mueller
The CMA decision is so clearly biased and incorrect that more and more people are wondering whether the reason is not just regulatory hubris or a lack of understanding of the technology markets involved, but whether it is even attributable (at least in part) to bad faith. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
That’s the basic deal, and I’m always surprised when other people are surprised by this. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
More to our current preoccupation, what about judges? [read post]