Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 4741 - 4760 of 6,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:01 am by Rosalind English
However, when they were locked in for periods during the day (routinely for lunch, staff changeovers and roll calls, and sometimes when they were not in work or education or when there were staff shortage), they said that prison officers would not manually open their cell door to enable them to use the toilet facilities, if required. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am by Rosalind English
The courts should take into account agreements such as the MoU and should assume that they would be adhered to, following RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2009) UKHL. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:32 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Juli 2010: historische, politische und rechtliche VoraussetzungenChristian Tomuschat, Die Anerkennung von Neustaaten – Die vorzeitige AnerkennungPeter Hilpold, Die Sezession im Völkerrecht – Erfordert das Kosovo-Gutachten des IGH eine Neubewertung dieses Instituts? [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:23 am by R Grace Rodriguez
  You groan with disgust, turn off the phone roll over hoping they won't call back. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Mentioning cases in which he said Strasbourg had rejected the balance of policy interests struck by British courts – S & Marper v UK and Gillan & Quinton v UK – he said British judges should be more assertive, or else they should not be surprised to find themselves rolled over with increasing regularity. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK:  Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Rob Robinson
| WSJ Law Blog - on.wsj.com/t3yBOo (Jennifer Smith) Litigants Beware: Create Reasonable Document Requests or Else You Might Be Paying for it in the Future - bit.ly/rOLE6j (Mike Hamilton) More “Top” Predictions: Top Ten eDiscovery Predictions for 2012 - bit.ly/rRX8nt (Dean Gonsowski) ‘Pippins v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:20 am by Russ Bensing
But Johnson didn’t roll the clock back to Vazirani. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The claimant appealed once again, the case now coming before the Master of the Rolls (alongside Moses and Munby LJJ) in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by INFORRM
The Master of the Rolls’ Committee on super injunctions earlier in the year emphasised in its Report its fundamental constitutional status, and stated that the principle “applies to interim injunction applications as it does to trials”. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman Earlier this month, I attended an event at University of Colorado Boulder called “The Economics of Privacy,” sponsored by the Silicon Flatirons center. [read post]