Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4741 - 4760 of 6,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 9:04 am by David Lindner
  Of course, condo sales have been in a slump across the country, but how much of the project’s demise was a result of the failure to achieve LEED Silver and the resulting loss of tax credits? [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:44 am
Officers reasonably entered defendant’s apartment without a warrant after a drug sale outside and then when officers moved to arrest, another fled inside and nobody would come to the door and there were sounds inside consistent with destruction of evidence. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:22 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court held that the transfer of branded software constitutes a sale and is exigible to sales tax, levied by State Governments under Entry 54, Schedule VII of the Constitution (Tata Consultancy Services v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
Pitman.Wrightsman, Lawrence S.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.Criminal ProcedureTZ2 D817 P 2010Criminal procedure : prosecuting crime / by Joshua Dressler, George C. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:45 am by Susan Brenner
It provides as follows: `[C]hild pornography’ means sexually explicit visual material which utilizes or has as a subject an identifiable minor. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm by Kelly
: Sanofi-Aventis v FDA, Sandoz (FDA Law Blog) (GenericsWeb) Mirapex (Pramipexole) – US: Mirapex case ends, Mylan Found to infringe Boehringer patent (Patent Docs) Moviprep (Polyethylene glycol) – US: Salix settles with Novel over Moviprep (IPBiz) Norvir (Ritonavir) – US: PUBPAT challenges eight of Abbott’s HIV/AIDS medicine patents (IP Watch) Strattera (Atomoxetine) – US: Eli Lilly granted 14-day injunction prohibiting production of generic Strattera:… [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 2:59 pm
(c) Is the defendant entitled to cancellation or modification of the Right of Way under s. 35 of the Property Law Act? [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:00 am
Cir. 2005) (en banc) ("[C]laims must be read in view of the specification, of which they are a part. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
  That is, if the defendants’ failure to test their [product] resulted in the sale of ‘defective’ [products] which ultimately injured plaintiff’s decedent, then the flawed design or manufacturing process would be the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries, not the failure to test. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:10 am by Jon Sands
The terms of the sale were protected, and the expectation of profit if the software had been properly sold was within the statute's purview. [read post]