Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am
" As Afghan forces enter the new fighting season, Foreign Policy adds that they “must get creative” and suggests that Kabul should be more selective in choosing battles over territory. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
I removed the State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am
But, more and more, the free speech battle is being waged by local affiliates as well as other free speech organizations.UPDATE: Steven R. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:14 am
- claims for injunctive relief under consumer protection laws of several states go forward. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
” * State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
– Kellogg North America Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Nixon, President of the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
From Miner v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Salinas v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:39 pm
” Iskanian v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:58 pm
The Supreme Court of Montana ruled 6-1 in Kulstad v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
” Since December 2007, it has been engaged in a court battle with the FEC over Sections 203, 201 and 311. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:55 pm
Circuit to hear a companion case, Halbig v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am
The speculators in Fletcher v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Jeff Koons v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
United States, [289 U.S. 1, (1933)], the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
Early last week, Epic Games lost the first round of its #FreeFortnite battle against Apple when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the Fortnite maker's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) with respect to the company's flagship game. [read post]