Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 22,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
In Connecticut State Dental v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:11 am
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Young v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:20 pm
GARY ZARS HOLDIG, LLC V. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:29 am
In Cook v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:32 am
In reversing, and citing last year’s en banc decision in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
When I took office, the country faced years of litigation and confusion because of conflicting rules set by Congress, federal regulators and states [See WIMS 5/19/09]. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions Body: SC18417 - Alexandre v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
The court stated that the prosecutors "failed to satisfy its burden to prove that consent was freely and voluntarily given. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:23 pm
" In Atkins v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
Because the state had already satisfied its burden of proof, the defendant’s silence would not be used to make the state’s case. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:57 am
According to the Fifth Circuit, the law passes constitutional scrutiny because it does not “impose a substantial burden on a large fraction of women” in the state. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 3:59 am
The Court places the burden on the government to show that it took "reasonable steps" to provide notice to the claimant. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
In Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
The Court stated it was ‘not persuaded’ by the appeal courts’ approach, and ‘cannot share their conclusion’. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:00 am
Owens v. [read post]
