Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 27,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
Factual and Procedural Background County issues well permits under an ordinance (Stanislaus County Code Chapter 9.36) incorporating by reference state well construction standards. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
According the 2018 Lerbakken v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:16 pm
Schwab v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:56 pm
State of NCT of Delhi, reaffirmed its views set out in the case of Sunil Bharti Mittal v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:35 am
However, by asserting that section 21167.6 “does not mandate document retention” and that Government Code section 26205.1 allows it to destroy records “not expressly required by law to be . [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
Aug. 18, 2004) (affirming conviction under Texas Penal Code § 46.02 for unlawfully carrying a handgun because Second Amendment does not provide a private right to keep and bear arms); Silveira v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:10 pm
Code §§ 4117.05(A), 4117.11(B)(6). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm
Meanwhile, there’s an additional directive from the government: invoking his authority under the statutory framework for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), President Trump separately ordered TikTok’s parent company ByteDance to divest itself of TikTok within 90 days (with the possibility of a one-month extension). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 11:06 am
Supreme Court decision in Azar v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Further, the defendants argued that the penalty could be avoided under section 1671 of the Civil Code. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:11 pm
The case is Calhoun v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:12 am
On Monday afternoon, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:04 am
” Going back to the 1895 Oriental Hotel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Everfresh Juice Co., 24 F.3d 893, 897 (7th Cir. 1994) (same), superseded on other grounds, as stated in Bond v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
Oral stock sale or transfer agreements used to be unenforceable under Section 8-319 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”). [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:59 pm
Code § 10A:4-4.1. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
