Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4741 - 4760 of 9,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Tuesday morning the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Here, as in her State Court first amended pleading, Davis alleged in her second amended petition, her live pleading, that her claims against Vargas had been settled. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting summary judgment, the district court found that the employee had not engaged in protected activity because of the job duties exception found in the First Circuit’s decision in Winslow v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:01 pm by Gene Quinn
First, is it appropriate for the United States Patent and Trademark Office to use a different claim constructions standard than is used in federal district court. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In 2015, public outcry erupted on the issue of district judges jailing convicted defendants who could not pay their fines; the outcry was first manifest in Eastpointe, then throughout the district courts across the state. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Our first petition seeking Fame is Manuel v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
A state district court judge, dismissing criminal charges against Defendant, ruled that Defendant acted “within his rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Derek Black
Judge James Wilson of the First Judicial District Court of Nevada (Carson City) has ruled in Lopez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In this judicial voyage, I proceeded with some difficulty because of the paucity of distinct authoritative precedents in certain critical areas. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
On appeal, Plaintiff–Appellant the United States (`Government’) argues that reversal is necessary because the district court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Krueger established prejudice.U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
 But as Judge Callahan points out, "[w]hile the Court found that heightened judicial scrutiny of the law was required, the Court did not actually apply heightened scrutiny. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Dawn Johnsen
For the first time since Roe, the country prepared for an onslaught of state abortion restrictions and efforts to revive state abortion restrictions enacted before Roe. [read post]