Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 4741 - 4760 of 7,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
” As part of this blog’s symposium on NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Rosalind English
Because the Act stipulates that governors may impose a levy it is open to governors to decide not to do so in a particular case. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:59 am by John H Curley
While agreeing with the Governor that he cannot pay for the raises if money has not been appropriated he referred to an arbitrator for additional fact finding on the question of whether the state doesn’t have money for the raises. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:51 am by Dan Filler
 But it also provides stiff tonic to policy advocates who imagined that states might choose to be thoughtful about race and capital punishment notwithstanding Justice Powell's legendary wimp-out decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
A v Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] 4 I.R. 88; [2006] IESC 45. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by sally
Regina (S) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (KF) v Same [2012] EWHC 1810 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 191 “Guidance in prison service instructions as to the approach to be followed by prison governors when exercising their discretion to make deductions from prisoners’ earnings to raise funds to support victims of crime was not unlawful. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am by Carolina Bracken
In particular, a scheme whereby a prisoner was compelled to pay half the money received from his family to the State was held to fall within the wide margin of appreciation afforded to states under A1P1 (Laduna v Slovakia, ECtHR, judgment of 13 December 2011) [46]. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
Governor Quinn has signed Public Act 97-688, a bill intended in part to overturn the Court's 2010 decision in Provena Covenant Medical Center v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by Chris Castle
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:45 am by Bill Raftery
After the Governor reviews the individual, the state’s senate must confirm the nomination. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
I think that after the Supreme Court’s foray into Bush v. [read post]