Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 4741 - 4760 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
21 Sep 2024, 8:55 am by Tom Smith
That’s true, but not because Wold is far from the mark. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark THE EGG for "facial toning machines for cosmetic use" on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:16 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
(quoting Glynwed, Inc., supra, 869 F.Supp. at 276)(internal quotation marks omitted)The law firm of LoFaro & Reiser, LLP represents both plaintiffs and defendants in successor liability actions and fraudulent asset transfers in federal and state courts throughout New Jersey. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
VIP Products LLC leaving open the question of whether the Rogers v. [read post]