Search for: "State v. Welcome" Results 4741 - 4760 of 6,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
In a press release, HHS states these proposed rules are intended to “provide greater certainty for healthcare providers participating in value-based arrangements and providing coordinated care for patients . . . while maintaining strong safeguards to protect patients and programs from fraud and abuse. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors of topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
While the conservative champions of the law may see that as precisely the goal, it would likely cause platforms to become less pleasant and welcoming to users. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am by Mary Szarkowicz
International Court of Justice Issues Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by charonqc
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am by Peter E. Harrell
What’s more, the Supreme Court gutted Congress’s ability to veto presidential actions under IEEPA with its 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
As to the combination between colour and shapes, the Court mentioned another similar case decided by the EU General Court with reference to the green square illustrated on the right (decision in Case T‑282/09, Fédération internationale des logis v. [read post]