Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 5,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
This year I read the case of Adam H. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:52 am
Herlihy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:56 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:23 am
Sherwood v Town of Lancaster In this Article 78 case, the petitioner sought to appeal the Supreme Court ruling that he was ineligible to receive credit for unused vacation and sick leave accrued as of the date of his retirement. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:52 am
Running for elected office could adversely affect individual’s continuation in his or her public employmentCusumano v Board of Commissioners, App. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:42 am
Exception to seeking competitive bids for good and servicesOmni Recycling of Westbury, Inc. v Town of Oyster Bay, 11 NY3d 868Typically a political subdivision of the State will solicit competitive bids for goods and services. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:35 pm
On July 15, 2010, the Massachusetts Appeals Court held in DiNitto v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
§ 20-1-119 applies to claims against the State); Allen v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
Claiming entitlement to payment for unused vacation and sick leave credit upon resignationSherwood v Town of Lancaster, 2010 NY Slip Op 06057, Decided on July 9, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentRichard J. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
(Ross v Louise Wise Serv., Inc., 8 NY3d 478, 489, quoting Walker v Sheldon, 10 NY2d 401, 405; see Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479; Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332, 335). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:06 pm
Seto and Friends of He ‘eia State Park et. al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Dorr v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
In light of the Court’s decision in Black v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
" Under the controlling reporter's privilege case, Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
Under the controlling reporter's privilege case, Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 10:05 am
Because the crypt-keepers, I mean bunker-managers, have calibrated the precise wind, barometer and temperature readings, and at this very moment the very freshest judicial utterances are wafting their way north from the "cold neutrality of a [coffee-swilling] impartial [court]":The above language is taken from footnote two of Judge Shepherd's opinion in Arce v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in State of Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
