Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 13,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 4:10 pm
In Day v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:05 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:23 am
Related Cases: Alasaad v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
In August, a federal panel of judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the 18 states standing to contest the non-payments in a case called House v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Morris case that is currently being considered, along with two similar cases, by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
Rosendez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
After losing in three levels of Canadian courts Google thumbed its nose at Canada’s highest court and launched a proceeding in California seeking an order that the Canadian court order can’t be enforced against it in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 10:35 am
Here is the opinion in County of Amador v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
” Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 6:54 am
Fla. 2014), a class action claim against the maker of Becks, Anheuser Busch, for marketing that allegedly deceived the plaintiffs into believing Becks was brewed in Germany, not the United States, was permitted to proceed despite the labels stating that the beer was brewed in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:04 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
And they also understand that the state’s ostensible goal—anti-pollution—could be more precisely accomplished by a law that is more directly tailored to the state’s purpose, a ban on littering (as the Court reasoned in Schneider v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 2:51 pm
If the Constitution of the United States leaves a decision to the democratic process, can the courts take it away on the basis of current theories of social science? [read post]
