Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 4741 - 4760 of 9,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 7:15 am by Guest Author
” As the opinion quoted, it provided:  that the forms of writs, executions and other process, except their style, and the forms and modes of proceeding in suits in those of common law, shall be the same as are now used in the said Courts respectively, in pursuance of the act entitled, “an act to regulate processes in the Courts of the United States,” except to far as may have been provided for by the act to establish the judicial Courts of the… [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm by Richa Srivastava
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) N D Illinois: Local patent rules do not apply to false marking with expired patents: Zojo Sol’ns., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(IP Watch)   Canada EU demands for trade deal would reshape Canadian IP law (Michael Geist) Federal Court considers colour marks: Peak Innovations Inc v Simpson Strong Tie Company (Canadian Trademark Blog)   China China’s standards and patent innovation proposals: problems for IPR and global trade? [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am by Aaron Rubin and Dina Roumiantseva
Applications for hashtag trademarks continue to soar, with over 1,042 hashtag trademark applications in 2015 in the United States alone. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In any event, the hearing officer considered that s.5(5) had been impliedly repealed, since the Secretary of State had exercised his powers to provide that a trade mark could be refused registration on relative grounds even where consent had been given, where the proprietor of the earlier trade mark raised an objection in opposition proceedings. [read post]