Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4741 - 4760 of 7,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In the states, we have had a viral contagion of state RFRA amendments that would make it possible for businesses to defend refusals to do business with homosexuals and/or same-sex couples (and in Arizona, with women, minorities, and the disabled, among others). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
United States left in lingering doubt just how far Congress may go to pass a law to implement a world treaty. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011). [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:09 am
Alternatively, if we find that Plaza's use was nonconforming at the time the ordinances were enacted, Plaza urges us to find the sexually oriented business ordinances unconstitutional pursuant to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05523 (2d Dept., 2019) the parties were married in July 2006 and had two minor children, Liya L. and Emery L. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 1:59 pm
United States, 303 F.2d 366, 368 (3rd Cir., 1962) (“the date of the original return governs”); Mabel Elevator Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Emily Galik
Because American Indians are “members of quasi-sovereign tribal entities” and not merely part of a “discrete racial group,” they retain unique federal protections compared to other racial minorities in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Professor Andrew Morriss suggests that we may have seen this dynamic in action in the Alabama legislature's response to LePage v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm by Lisa Ouellette
But the Court’s decision said nothing about the argument of the United States as amicus curiae that official immunity should still be available, so this issue remains undetermined. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Alexander, No. 06-1867 A sentence for sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in failing to provide notice of an upward variance as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
EMA, concerning a ban on the sale of violent video games to minors; and Snyder v. [read post]