Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 66,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 3:04 pm
Moreover, as discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:34 am
United States Dep’t of Commerce. [read post]
1 May 2025, 7:32 am
Zelman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Our Watch With Tim Thompson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 8:58 pm
Chicago, holding that the Second Amendment's individual right to keep and bear arms for self defense (subject to reasonable regulation) applies to the states as well as the federal government. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
The wall of separation between Church and State (Everson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
In Case of Lautsi and Others v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Netherlands (1979) 1 EHRR 647; Ozturk v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
Both here -- in the arbitration context -- as well as elsewhere.So let's hear it for the Ginsberg-Scalia-Kennedy-Souter-Thomas party. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm
The court stated that, on the facts outlined above, the “basic elements of a good, strong harassment claim [in English law] are present“. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
The table sugar producers also pleaded facts that would support a joint-tortfeasor theory of liability by alleging that the association, at the direction of and in concert with several of its member companies, crafted a publicity campaign to revitalize and rebrand HFCS.The table sugar producers failed to state a claim against Roquette America by alleging only that a senior executive was a member of the CRA’s board of directors.The July 31, 2012, decision in Western Sugar Cooperative… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
The state? [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 10:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:13 pm
It bears a distribution list, signed by Mr Debney, with the names of 50 or so personnel covering every State and Head Office. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
