Search for: "AT&T"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 881,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 3:08 pm
photo © 2007 Dave | more info (via: Wylio)The firm wishes all good people a warm and happy Thanksgiving. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
NOTE OF ISSUE STRICKEN BECAUSE “MATERIAL DISCOVERY WAS OUTSTANDING”Because he had suffered an injury while on-property, GG commenced a personal-injury action against the owner, One Hudson Yards Owner, LLC, and others, in the Kings County Supreme Court.When GG’s lawyer later filed a form with the court claiming that the case was ready for trial, the defendants objected citing GG’s failure to provide medical authorizations (which had been demanded back in 2019), and to the fact… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:34 pm
Orin is right to criticize Phil's canard-crushing post. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 10:50 pm
Triple T Specialty Meats, Inc. produced the chicken salad that ill people reported eating. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm
Kevin T. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:39 pm
Carl T. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:17 pm
SO YOU’VE GOT A BLOATED, UNTRUSTWORTHY PRODUCT THAT PEOPLE AREN’T BUYING AND DON’T LIKE — WHAT’S YOUR SOLUTION? [read post]
10 May 2017, 2:58 pm
This isn't the first time... [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:47 am
Yeah, that ain't legal. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Well, they ain't wrong. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 10:25 am
... we don't walk. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
I hate that whole "people are all individuals and see things many different ways" thing, don't you? [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 10:26 am
As was stated in the decision T 1198/97 [7]: "Even when an appeal has been filed, only the department of first instance before which the OPs took place is competent and at the same time also obliged to decide in first instance on a request concerning the contents of the minutes of OPs held before it, firstly because it is their competence and duty under R 76 EPC 1973 to draw up the minutes correctly and completely and secondly because, if anybody, only the members of this department… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:01 pm
Pursuant to Article 24 RPBA, “[t]hese Rules of Procedure shall enter into force upon entry into force of the revised text of the EPC in accordance with Article 8 of the Revision Act”. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:03 pm
Within the framework of the interpretation of claim 1 [adopted by the Board], the only technically meaningful understanding of this feature which results from the original disclosure is that those code circuits are separated which have been created, and therefore, used, beforehand by cryptographic methods.[2.4] The [opponent’s] argumentation referred to decision T 792/94. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The opponent appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to reject the opposition.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (my English translation):Gate leaf (Torblatt) for a sectional gate, in particular a roll-up gate (Deckengliedertor), wherein a wicket door (Schlupftür) is integrated in the gate leaf, the wicket door comprising a door leaf (Türblatt) and a frame (Zarge) for framing the door leaf, the gate leaf being movable along a predetermined path… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
It didn’t. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
For AT&T as a whole, it zeroes out. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:33 am
AT&T's own statements to the FCC, made in the years prior to the AT&T/Time Warner merger, supported the DOJ's case that a merged entity could raise the price of programming. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 1:08 pm
Enlarge / A T-Mobile logo at a store in New York on April 30, 2018. [read post]
