Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 4,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2008, 5:22 am
Otherwise, you risk danger of injury by an abuser or interference with the settlement of custody, parenting time, or property issues. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:52 am
May 8: New Hampshire’s Senate Judiciary Committee recommended referring that state’s version (HB 1422) to an interim summer study. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:24 am
In Kansas, that state’s governor signed SB 79 on May 21. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
(c) Mutiny or conspiracy by two or more members of the crew or other persons on board of a vessel on the high seas, for the purpose of rebelling against the authority of the captain or commander of such vessel, or by fraud or violence taking possession of such vessel. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
(Missouri’s Rules Committee passage was more procedural than substantive). [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice S. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United void. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
” Virginia’s bans, while initially appearing to be advancing, were deferred into the 2013 legislative session. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:36 pm
As of today, the status of the 44 break down as follows: 20 died due to adjournment or had been rejected by their respective legislatures. 11 failed to make it out of committee in their originating house before the legislature’s internal deadline. 1 failed to make it out of committee in the second house before the legislature’s internal deadline (Oklahoma HB 1552). 1 was signed into law (Arizona’s HB 2064 on April 12). 11 remain at least… [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
(c) Revolt, or conspiracy to revolt, by two or more persons on board a ship on the high seas against the authority of the master. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
’s computer. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
Sometimes, for example as in the case of the Court of Appeal, the different judicial divisions may reach different opinions on subjects ranging from marriage to child custody, service of processes, and enforcement of awards and judgments. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
With many agencies sharing responsibility, it’s hard to know who is responsible for what, and easy for emerging problems that haven’t historically fallen under anyone’s purview, to fall through the cracks. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Bill Provisions Status Alaska HB 88 Prohibits a court, arbitrator, mediator, administrative agency, or enforcement authority from applying a foreign law if application of the foreign law would violate an individual’s right guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Alaska or the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
June proved to be a repeat of May’s efforts. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
No Alaska HB 88 Prohibits a court, arbitrator, mediator, administrative agency, or enforcement authority from applying a foreign law if application of the foreign law would violate an individual’s right guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Alaska or the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Alaska HB 88 Prohibits a court, arbitrator, mediator, administrative agency, or enforcement authority from applying a foreign law if application of the foreign law would violate an individual’s right guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Alaska or the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
As of today, the status of the 47 breaks down as follows: 38 died due to adjournment or had been rejected by their respective legislatures. 1 was signed into law (Arizona’s HB 2064 on April 12). 8 remain at least theoretically active: 4 in Alabama; 3 in Iowa; 1 in North Carolina. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:50 pm
Under Rules 2-01(b) and (c) of Regulation S-X, an auditor is considered not to be “independent” if, at any time during the engagement, the auditor provides prohibited non-auditor services to the client, such as bookkeeping or financial statement preparation services. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:50 pm
Under Rules 2-01(b) and (c) of Regulation S-X, an auditor is considered not to be “independent” if, at any time during the engagement, the auditor provides prohibited non-auditor services to the client, such as bookkeeping or financial statement preparation services. [read post]
