Search for: "Doe VI " Results 4761 - 4780 of 5,624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
As President of the UK institution that represents 1,850 patent attorneys – most of whom are also qualified as European patent attorneys [and many of whom certainly creak, whether the patent system does or not ...] [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
The new procedure does not involve any loss of rights for the applicant. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the deletion of the feature “said medicament not being merely a sunscreen” in claim 1 has the effect of broadening the scope of the amended claim vis-à-vis claim 1 as granted with the consequence that claim 1 […] has been amended in such a way as to extend the protection conferred by the granted patent contrary to the requirement of A 123(3). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
Omar, surprisingly, had apparently held that an offer of temporary Part VII or indeed permanent Part VI accommodation could fall under 193(5) as well as 193(7F) and so the only requirement to be met was that the LA was satisfied as to suitability. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
Omar, surprisingly, had apparently held that an offer of temporary Part VII or indeed permanent Part VI accommodation could fall under 193(5) as well as 193(7F) and so the only requirement to be met was that the LA was satisfied as to suitability. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Buce
" One is tempted to say that the effective sum is anybody's guess, but the New Living Translation says "a year's wages" which is functional but not literal (the New International Version says more than a year's wages"), so even functionality does not settle matters.What we do know is that it is enough for the observers to complain about, leading to an oddly dismissive response from the man (sic?) [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by WIMS
 At this point, BP is conducting ranging operations and they drill 15 feet, stop, and do a position vis-à-vis the well bore. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:24 pm
Filing a Board appeal does not, unto itself, entitle an appellant to de novo review of all aspects of a rejection. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:17 am by INFORRM
It is pointed out that the bill does not deal with costs, damages or misuse of private information [8]. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:02 am by Joshua Glazov
  Under the principle of subrogation, Acme steps into your shoes (or boots) vis-a-vis Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
However, the client should be made aware of the alternatives if the mediation does not result in a complete settlement so that when the mediation actually takes place, the client can weigh those alternatives, especially if the parties end up in an impasse situation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm by admin
What does it do to the people who live there? [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:02 pm by Ryan M. Rodenberg
The case won't receive much attention vis-a-vis the Supreme Court's recent American Needle decision, but is important for a number of reasons. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, when it comes to the issue of inventive step pursuant to A 56 the ED should assess obviousness vis-à-vis the state of the art (see T 278/00 and T 87/08). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
Unlike the dissent, we refuse to unnecessarily weaken legislative protection of consumers so that restaurants who serve customers hidden, disgusting objects, as here, are protected as long as the customer does not actually eat the object or the object subsequently tests benign. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Does the secret lie in the facts before the referring court?] [read post]