Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 4761 - 4780 of 12,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Issue: Whether ERISA section 514(a), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Third, on 1 April 2011, there was judgment in Awdry, Bailey & Douglas v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 785 (QB) (1 April 2011). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by Howard Knopf
The 'fair dealing' exceptions found under s. 29 of the Act state that using works fairly for research or private study do not violate copyright, and neither does criticism, review or news reporting so long as the work is properly cited. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
Defense attorneys demurred to the class action complaint on the ground that “under California law, the made-whole doctrine does not include a consideration of attorney fees and costs in determining whether an insured was made whole. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:06 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
All OSHA safety standards are published under Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations or CFR, Parts 1902-1990. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am by Andrew Frisch
The FLSA defines the term “employ” to include “to suffer or permit to work” but does not define what “work” is. 29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to R 108(1) the EBA shall reject the petition as inadmissible if the petition does not comply with A 112a, paragraph 1, 2 or 4, R 106 or R 107, paragraph 1(b) or 2. [2.1] The mandatory requirement set up in the above-cited provisions that the petition shall be reasoned is not a formality. [read post]
  For example, the final rule does not apply to: (1) grants; (2) contracts and agreements with and grants to the Indian Tribes; and (3) construction and services contracts that are exempt from coverage under the DBA or the SCA. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am by Hakemi
Supreme Court and affirmed at the Court of Appeal on January 29, 2003. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am by Jeffrey Forrest and Jennifer Gunsch
County of San Diego (10/29/14, D064243) On October 29, 2014, the Fourth District California Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed the trial court’s decision in favor of Sierra Club, agreeing that the County of San Diego’s adopted Climate Action Plan (CAP) violated CEQA. [read post]
19 May 2007, 7:25 am
That ranks 7th out of the 16 National League teams and trails National League Central rivals the Brewers (26-16 record/29 RCAA, 4th in NL) and the Cubs (19-21/7 RCAA/6th). [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It will also consider, if the Court does have this jurisdiction, whether German Law is the proper law governing a claim for child maintenance and whether the laws governing such a claim are inadequately accessible and insufficiently precise to have the quality of law within the meaning of the ECHR, Protocol 1, art 1. [read post]