Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 5,281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 1:37 pm
However, those same 1,000 visitors can produce $1,000 or more in commercial use licenses, assuming a 1% conversion rate at $100 per license. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:14 am
Notwithstanding the evolution of the treatment of offers to settle in the Rules, it is clear that one of the principal purposes of Rule 37B remains the same as that noted of the former Rule 37 by Cumming J.A. in Skidmore v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:00 am
Walgreen 37. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
The fact that a judgment given by the courts of a Member State, concerning land situated in an area of that State over which its Government does not exercise effective control, cannot, as a practical matter, be enforced where the land is situated does not constitute a ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement under Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 and it… [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Today, the ECJ delivered two judgments on the interpretation of the Brussels I Regulation. 1. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:30 pm
See, e.g., Trademark Rules 2.32, 2.34(a), and 2.47(a) and (e), 37 C.F.R. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 9:23 am
I was a level 1 but now with the AWA I am level 3 (in Missouri). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:40 am
§ 37:1-10). [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
I find that the fact that they were stored and maintained there with some involvement by Dina, with a portion of them on display, does not make them "household furnishings" within the definition contained in s. 96(1) of the EAA.Accordingly, the gun collection will not go to Dina Zeitler. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
., 28 B.C.L.R. 230, [1981] 5 W.W.R. 24, 21 C.P.C. 260, [1982] I.L.R. 1-1459, 124 D.L.R. (3d) 455 (C.A.). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:39 am
Bartholomew's Church, 56 NY2d 71, 76 (1982); Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165 (1975); Matter of New York, Lackawanna & Western R. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
The Employer gave show-up pay to 37 off-duty employees on Oct. 17. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
“Claims” as contemplated by the Act are broadly defined as: (1) "Claim" means any cause of action against a certified public accountant or firm, regardless of the legal basis of the claim, including but not limited to tort, fraud, breach of contract, or any other legal basis, arising out of any engagement to provide professional services, including but not limited to the following: (a) The providing of attest services as defined in R.S.… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:11 am
App. 2007); In re Paternity of P.E.M., 818 N.E.2d 32, 37 (Ind. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
If Questions 1 to 3 are answered in the negative, in order to prevent distortion of competition, must it be possible under national legislation for the national authority to be placed under an obligation to initiate, of its own motion, an action for the annulment of trade marks which have previously been wrongly registered? [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The FBI estimated that approximately $1 billion in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes targeted by Operation “Malicious Mortgage. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:56 am
What does this tell us, back here in LawFirm Land and out of McKinsey Land? [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:12 pm
Clarke, 2003 BCCA 670, 22 B.C.L.R. (4th) 1 at para. 62. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 3:44 am
Does the clause mean that the government can’t require the application for a permit prior to an assembly? [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Thus, under section 768: "[o]ne who intentionally causes a third person not to enter into a prospective contractual relation with another who is his competitor or not to continue an existing contract terminable at will does not interfere improperly with the other's relation if: (a) the relation concerns [*37] a matter involved in the competition between the actor and the other; (b) the actor does not employ wrongful means; (c) his action does not… [read post]
