Search for: "FIRST MERIT"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 32,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2013, 6:51 pm
First, lets discuss the English Rule. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 8:31 am
Its launch was inauspicious as glitches prevented access for the first few days. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
First, the mosaic theory represents a dramatic departure from the basic building block of existing Fourth Amendment doctrine. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:51 am
Here are a few odds and ends which merit Grits readers' attention:A proposed resolution this Thursday at the Austin City Council directs city staff to draft regulations for municipal court judges significantly limiting when people may be arrested for nonpayment of Class C fines. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
First, I didn't write the headline, which is idiotic. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:54 pm
These are all personal observations, which have nothing to do with the merits of the judgment. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
The first drug ever approved that can fix a faulty gene ... [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:53 am
During the proceedings, Ruggedcom Inc. was taken over by Siemens.The judge chided the parties for bringing a second action in the case when the issues involved were “intricately” linked to the first one. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 8:31 am
Its launch was inauspicious as glitches prevented access for the first few days. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 4:56 am
Thus, this could be an implicit agreement that the cases have merit. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 6:10 pm
The court declined to address the merits of the case because the tenant failed to preserve error. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
The first Queen’s Counsel admissions were made in Upper Canada in 1841. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:56 am
Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report on a Dodd-Frank-mandated study of the merits and feasibility of creating a professional organization responsible for establishing standards for, and overseeing compliance of, rating analysts employed by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs). [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
So let's clear the browser tabs with a roundup of items which may merit independent Grits posts but probably won't get them:Sandra Bland and traffic enforcement as revenue generationDebbie Nathan suggests that the "real reason" Sandra Bland was locked up is that traffic enforcement has become about revenue generation. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Put another way, the reason why a functional approach is necessary to resolve the threshold question of "minister status" is also one of the reasons why applying the ministerial exception to claims of hostile work environment is necessary to respect the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:22 pm
First, in a lengthy discussion, the court concluded that Pennsylvania has standing to bring the challenge because of its "quasi-sovereign interest in safeguarding the health and wellbeing of its women residents," and because it will now "have to increase its expenditures for State and local programs providing contraceptive services. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 6:30 pm
The post FTC Noncompete Ban in Jeopardy, Likely Unlawful appeared first on Texas Noncompete Law. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Since, up until this case, the FTC's data security actions have been settled out of court, this case marks the first time that the courts have ruled on the merits of the FTC's authority related to data security actions. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:07 pm
Under such a procedure, the policy of protecting the efficiency and economy of litigation is not furthered by the continuation of tolling—first, pending resolution of the remaining claims in the trial court and, then, pending review and disposition in the appellate court.In contrast, in our state system, the death knell doctrine allows the parties the benefit of immediate appellate review of an order denying class certification. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:11 pm
The IPKat and Merpel, after due consideration, both thought that Birss J's ruling raised an issue that was important enough to merit a sidebar poll, so they composed one: here's what 101 of our readers thought of the matter: The chilling effect of this ruling is bad for freedom of speech and bad for the public’s right to know 23 (22%) Volkswagen are acting as Trade Secret trolls, exercising their rights in an abusive manner 9 (8%) It’s just a random ruling on its own… [read post]
