Search for: "German v. German"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In Troxel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
The feature constituted advertising harassment, violating German laws on data protection and unfair trade practices. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not 9. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am
Menzel v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
In this case a German painter sued Google for making her images available as thumbnails in the Google Image Searches. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/7jrRWbT4Zu -> Supreme Court ruling in CLS Bank v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:56 pm
(R.) v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
” [v] Interview on a Colombian television network In 2007, on the program ‘Hablando claro con la prensa’ of a Colombian television network, Yair Klein said in an interview that he did not regret his actions in the country. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:09 pm
The Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:21 pm
See also Givens v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
