Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
One example of this is Intellectual Venture Management, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:42 am
(EEOC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm
The case was remanded back to the district court after the appellate court found that certain instructions given by the district court to the jury were erroneous and prejudicial. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONK. v K. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:10 am
In a court order approving a settlement agreement (full text) in Greene v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:05 am
" Blacoh Fluid Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
On April 4, the Internal Revenue Service announced two releases that give guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
And on its review, the Appellate Term, Second Department, noted that given the plaintiffs’ concession that the UPC was supplied by a reseller, they were thus unable to show that Amazon had breached any duty owed to them. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:05 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Child Evangelism Fellowship of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Teesta Atul Setalvad v State of Gujarat may well be a test case to decide whether the State's eagerness for custodial interrogation of an accused has to be given primacy over the accused's civil liberties. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Wentz v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #B.W. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”Given that the hole was “open and obvious,” the AD2 affirmed the outcome and allowed the dismissal to stand.Guess Balgley was left holding the bag there.# # #Balgley v City of New York [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
”In this instance, given that the postal worker contented that the USPS records contained pertinent data, and that there was other evidence which suggested that the owner had notice of the condition, the AD2 agreed that the timing of the owner’s motion was a bit early and left the outcome undisturbed.Guess the AD2 delivered some bad news there.# # #DECISIONK. v 21-43 27th St., LLC [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:48 am
Without adding to the discussion, the high court concluded that the trial court made no error of law or unsupported determination of fact and did not abuse its discretion (Fuchs v. [read post]
10 May 2025, 12:46 pm
by Dennis Crouch This is a follow-up on my recent discussion of Ingenico v. [read post]
