Search for: "House v. House" Results 4761 - 4780 of 41,225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 8:29 am
  I discovered that the homeowner in the story is Susette Kelo, the petitioner in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm by Kelly
A recent CBS News/New York Times poll has the White House scratching its head. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
Damages for unlawfully evicted secure tenants by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 11:36 am
  John Vlahakis, appellant, v Mendelson & Associates, et al., respondents. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am by Giles Peaker
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm by Giles Peaker
Emambee v London Borough of Islington (2019) EWHC 2835 (QB) We saw what seemed like a rather harsh refusal on permission to bring a s.204 Housing Act 1996 homelessness appeal out of time in London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) (our note). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
The case does not make new law, relying as it does on the House of Lords' test in Stack v Dowden, yet two judges in the lower courts and one Lord Justice in the Court of Appeal, applying that test, considered that the respondent was entitled to a 90% share in the property. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:51 pm
Gunnery Sergeant Gallagher lived in military housing with his wife and children. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
… review decisions are prepared by housing officers, who occupy a post of considerable responsibility and who have substantial experience in the housing field, but they are not lawyers. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 295 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific to the claimant and essential to his defence to serious charges which might carry the death penalty, in confidence to… [read post]