Search for: "Johns v State" Results 4761 - 4780 of 22,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
John Edwards (North Carolina) dodged the human-rights-versus-national-security dichotomy posited, and so in turning to Sen. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:55 am by library
The scenario is one that Cornell Professor John Blume has published on frequently throughout his career and he has recently been quoted in media reports detailing the court’s decision to clarify its death penalty jurisprudence by granting cert in Hall v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
EEO/iNewsSelected from iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity, © 2009 John D. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:59 pm
Part V considers whether recognition of perpetual trusts is prohibited in states with a constitutional prohibition of perpetuities. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
For a copy of Ninth Circuit's decision (dated April 25, 2007), please use this link: Hudock v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:10 am by Ronald Mann
It is not hard to see why this morning’s opinion in Americold Realty Trust v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  So, too, in 1989 the Court appointed John Roberts, currently the Chief Justice, as amicus to defend the judgment below in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/XMMpMQomkl -> John Degen: The book stops here http://t.co/5Ps2TRgmWY -> It’s Illegal For Offline Retailers To Collect Email Addresses–Capp v. [read post]