Search for: "Jones Act"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 7,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Resolve Marine, 2009 WL 2984199, a case decided here in the Eastern District of Louisiana, plaintiff, a Jones Act seaman, moved to amend his Complaint to claim punitive damages for the alleged gross, willful and wanton negligence of his employer in causing his injuries. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm
Crew members must know that they are subject to the Jones Act, which entitles the crew to a safe workplace. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
In a new policy paper, Colin Grabow of the Cato Institute argued that the Jones Act has significantly impaired the domestic shipbuilding industry, and should be repealed. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:06 pm
A seaman assumes the risks normally incident to his perilous calling but as to perils resulting from unreasonably unsafe working conditions and/or negligence of fellow employees, the common law doctrine of "assumption of risk" has been eliminated by the Federal Employees Liability Act ("FELA") which is made applicable to seamen by the Jones Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:11 pm
Jones, supra. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:27 pm
In Jones et al. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
But the Jones Act, under which they were covered, was only for negligence on the part of the ship owners and the Defense Base Act did not cover them. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984). [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:33 am
” Jones v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:08 am
The Commission proposed a large trader registration and reporting regime for the third time shortly before the flash crash of May 6, 2010, in which the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell about 900 points and then recovered those losses within minutes. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
(Jones v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
Jones (1999) on the duty to breach confidentiality in cases of known danger. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
" One prime weapon that the insurer has is the "prior acts" doctrine. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Petitioner Stanford (represented by Jones Day and Pam Karlan) does not confront the statutory language – Stanford’s brief does not even cite Patent Act § 101. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The family of Stanley-Jones agreed to an $8.25 million settlement with the city of Detroit. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012). [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm
All Coast, LLC – Background The issue before the Court in Adams was the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) classification of All Coast employees who served aboard the company’s liftboats. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 5:52 am
Perverted Justice contends its mere presence acts as a deterrent. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:02 am
Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012). [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm
Jones of counsel), for respondents McCabe & Mack, LLP and David L. [read post]
