Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 4761 - 4780 of 6,907
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 11:52 pm by admin
Sources: Inside Nova – Harley-Davidson to recall more than 308,000 motorcycles Harley Owners Group HOG Fairfax VA Chapter – NHTSA Safety Recalls USA Today – Harley recalls about 308,000 motorcycles for brake issue *v [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:18 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Also, according to Russian law, similar to the law of most countries (including Thailand, where V. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:27 am by Paralegal Mentor
Screening Jessica from the PeeWee Cosmetics v Goliath Corporation is the most effective choice. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by SHG
 § 704(b), having granted cert in  United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz) US: Patent protection for the BRCA1 gene and genetic diagnostic methods in the USA: AMP v USPTO (JIPLP) US: Marking with an unenforceable patent does not create intent to deceive: Hollander v Hospira (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US: Regenerative Sciences lawsuit update and FDA’s attempt to broaden the definition of “interstate commerce”: USA v Regenerative Sciences (FDA Law Blog)   Products… [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Nabiha Syed
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A witness statement referred to advice received from a practising American lawyer on the SPEECH Act, a federal version of the ‘Rachel’s Law’ statute introduced in New York State following a campaign by the Defendant in Bin Mahfouz v Ehrenfeld ([2005] EWHC 1156 (QB)] (a case in which an American author was found to have libelled a Saudi billionaire in a book published in the USA). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
____________*Constitutional scholars of the Episcopal Church (USA) might well want to ask themselves: what, exactly, went "into [canonical] effect" on July 1, 2011? [read post]