Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 4761 - 4780 of 13,622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Matthew David Brozik
Instead, they sued in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, petitioning the court for cancellation of the GOOGLE marks under the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by Scott Bomboy
One significant case decided outside of the Court’s normal term time period was United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm by EEM
Reinhardt: "The government forces us to participate in ripping apart a family" (ImmigrationProf Blog, May 2017) [text]The Justice Department’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari in IRAP v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
United States, a case that could have major Fourth Amendment implications. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The United States Supreme Court provided a description of comity with some guiding principles in Hilton v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Kara Goodwin and Noah Finkel Pending before the United States Supreme Court is a petition for writ of certiorari asking the Court to determine whether an employer may use payments for bona fide meal periods as an offset/credit against compensable work time. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic
United States, agreeing to review the decision by the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
Amira Mikhail and Jordan Brunner summarized the Justice Department’s cert petition in IRAP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:08 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine, "[w]hether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am by Josh Blackman
These difficulties are amplified exponentially when the client is the President of the United States, and he continuously sabotages his lawyers, who are struggling to defend his policies in an already-hostile arena. [read post]