Search for: "R G
v.
G S"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 6,912
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
Rather, they were only concerned with the claimant’s employment. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
R (on the application of G) (Respondent) v The Governors of X School (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 30 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to a fair trial, is engaged in internal disciplinary proceedings if the will have a “substantial influence” on future proceedings which are likely to determine a civil right. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:36 am
Oakland Heritage Alliance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/836779.no2.pdf State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884: The City's significance threshold to evaluate seismic impacts did not violate CEQA for two reasons: (1) there is no requirement that a significance threshold be formally adopted; and (2) the significance threshold used substantially conformed to the significance threshold for service impacts in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:08 am
Le propriétaire peut vérifier auprès des précédents bailleurs si le locataire a été un bon locataire ou non. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
His concurrence was joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:58 am
” The court then held that the penalty of terminating the teacher from her position “could not be construed as disproportionate to the challenged conduct, inasmuch as CBA Article 21(G)(6) explicitly called for "mandatory" termination in cases of sexual misconduct. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
In Stern v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Michael G. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
[Readers: Set forth below is a thoughtful and detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's decision of Walmart v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The Ninth Circuit found none of these arguments convincing.The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
(paragraph 84) In dealing with the Claimant’s Article 6 point, Stadlen J conducts an equally thorough review of the authorities, including most recently R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14, Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Trust [2010] ICR 101, and R (G) v X School Governors [2010] 1 WLR 2218. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:09 am
A-G’s opinion published – Merck & Co Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (EPLAW) (The SPC Blog) US: Supreme Court to revisit patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods: Mayo v Prometheus (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (PharmaPatents) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Intellectual property problems for personalized medicine (BIOtechNow) US: Supreme Court ruling in Stanford v Roche (IPKat)… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Widdows, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1500 (21 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) EH v Kent County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 709 (21 June 2011) AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) IR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 704 (21 June 2011) J Varney & Sons Waste Management Ltd. v Hertfordshire County Council… [read post]
