Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 7,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 2:14 pm
Section 13(a) (1) and Section 13(a) (17) also exempt certain computer employees. [read post]
I think (I'm a company), therefore I am? EPO Enlarged Board seeks comments on resuscitated companies
6 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the European Patent Office (EPO) has just announced that it is seeking from third parties written statements on case G 1/13, referred to the EBA by Technical Board of Appeal (TBA) 3.3.7 with interlocutory decision of 21 June 2013 in case T 22/09. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:08 pm
Failure to report suspected abuse or neglect is a Class A misdemeanor (Texas Health & Safety Code Section 242.122). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
The trial court properly imposed waiting time penalties under Labor Code section 203. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:10 am
The 2013 legislative session ends on Sept. 13. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Eschewing the Senate’s 13-year path to citizenship, the House, now in recess, is divided against itself. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Rodriguez, __ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 8/21/13) is available here. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:56 pm
On January 13, 1997 the People stated that they were still waiting for the corroborating affidavit from the arresting officer. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
TEXAS ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Answer #5 As taken from the DOS website: Applicants are sometimes refused under section 221(g) because your case requires further procedure or review by our office or another U.S. government agency. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:29 pm
State of Haryana, (2004) 13 SCC 9; Ranjit Singh v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:13 pm
(Eastern) – Register; and OFCCP Webinars on the Section 503 Final on August 30, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
The Eighth Circuit rejected that argument, and declined to adopt the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning in Todd, holding that the plain language of Section 13(b) indicates that “knowledge” is only required for criminal liability under Section 13(b)(4) and (5), and not for civil liability under Section 13(b)(2) or Rule 13b2-2. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The Eighth Circuit rejected that argument, and declined to adopt the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning in Todd, holding that the plain language of Section 13(b) indicates that “knowledge” is only required for criminal liability under Section 13(b)(4) and (5), and not for civil liability under Section 13(b)(2) or Rule 13b2-2. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:40 am
The account by Ms Cudd of what she was allegedly told by the court office had first surfaced in January 2013 in the present appeal.The High Court held:.1. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:40 am
The account by Ms Cudd of what she was allegedly told by the court office had first surfaced in January 2013 in the present appeal.The High Court held:.1. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Law Office of Thomas Mottaz work injury lawyers The Minnesota Worker’s Compensation statute underwent substantial revision during the past legislative session. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
Court Weighs in on "Executive Officer" Definition Get your copy today and take advantage of our "Rest of '13" No-Risk Trial to The Corporate Counsel - Dave Lynn [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
Court Weighs in on "Executive Officer" Definition Get your copy today and take advantage of our "Rest of '13" No-Risk Trial to The Corporate Counsel - Dave Lynn [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 11:47 am
Vizzini "surrendered" the trademark in July, and the US Patent and Trademark office officially canceled the trademark yesterday. [read post]
