Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS" Results 4761 - 4780 of 7,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm by Jeralyn
The U.S. government truly stands alone when insisting on hiding behind false claims of state secrets,” said Steven Watt, staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
They provide a lot of insight into the workings over at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
The Court, in an opinion co-authored by Justices Stevens and O'Connor, had just recently upheld that restriction by a 5-4 vote in McConnell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Weiler, Editorial: State and Nation; Church, Mosque and Synagogue-- the Trailer, 8 I-Con: International Journal of Constitutional Law 157-166 (2010).Steven H. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Epic Systems v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am by Nabiha Syed
Mike Dorf recaps an ABA webinar on last Term’s animal cruelty “crush video” case, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Steven Skow, et al., a case which arose from the failure of Integrity Bank, Alpharetta, Georgia (“Integrity”), on August 29, 2008,1 and FDIC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania and in Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
Briefly: Ilya Somin of the Volokh Conspiracy discusses recent comments by now-retired Justice Stevens regarding the Court’s decision in Kelo v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Kentucky's protocol lacksbasic safeguards used by other States to confirm that an inmate is unconscious before injection of the second and 2 BAZE v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, dissenting in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:13 pm
In Crawford, another plurality, led by Stevens, rejected a facial attack on the Indiana statute after concluding that there was insufficient evidence that the law burdened the right to vote and that the state's interest in preventing voter fraud was legitimate. [read post]